1. What We Fact-Check
Fact-checking applies most strongly to statements that a reader could reasonably treat as objective
or actionable facts. Not every sentence requires the same level of verification, so we focus effort
where an inaccurate claim could materially mislead a reader.
Product & App Details
Availability, supported platforms, access methods and major feature claims.
Payments & Promotions
Payment-method availability, bonuses, limits, eligibility and key promotional terms.
Legal & Safety Claims
Regulatory statements, age restrictions and responsible-gambling information.
2. Claims We Prioritise
Some claims require stronger verification because they change frequently or may directly influence user decisions.
- Bonus amounts, promo conditions and wagering requirements.
- Minimum deposits, withdrawals, fees and processing information.
- Availability of UPI, wallets, bank methods or other payment options.
- Android, iOS or other app availability and download instructions.
- Statements about legality, regulation or geographic availability.
- Claims involving account verification, security or responsible gambling.
Higher-risk claims require higher-quality evidence. A promotional claim or legal statement
should not be accepted merely because it appears on another affiliate or review website.
3. Source Standards
We prefer sources that are closest to the information being verified and that have a clear reason to know the facts.
| Claim Type |
Preferred Source |
Typical Use |
| Product features |
Official product or service pages |
App features, account options, sports coverage |
| Promotions |
Current official promotion terms |
Bonus value, eligibility, validity, wagering |
| Payments |
Current official payment information |
Methods, limits, availability, processing details |
| Legal or regulatory claims |
Government, regulator or primary legal material |
Restrictions, regulatory status, compliance statements |
| Secondary context |
Reputable independent sources |
Background, explanation or corroboration |
Search snippets, copied summaries, anonymous claims and low-quality aggregator pages are not sufficient
on their own for important or sensitive claims.
4. Our Verification Process
The exact process varies by topic, but the following workflow describes our preferred approach for material claims.
1
Define
Identify the exact factual claim that needs verification.
2
Source
Find the most direct and authoritative source available.
3
Compare
Check whether multiple sources agree or whether context differs.
4
Check Date
Confirm that the information is recent enough for the claim.
5
Publish Carefully
Use wording no stronger than the evidence supports.
5. Time-Sensitive Information
Some information can become inaccurate quickly. This is especially true for promotions, payment methods,
app-distribution links, account requirements and product availability.
- Time-sensitive data should be checked near the publication date.
- Pages should display a meaningful “last reviewed” or “last updated” date after substantive review.
- Old values should be removed or corrected when reliable newer information is available.
- When current information cannot be confirmed, the page should say so rather than invent a number.
6. Legal and Regulatory Claims
Legal and regulatory statements require special care. We avoid reducing complex legal questions to simple,
universal claims when rules may differ by jurisdiction or change over time.
Legal standard: when discussing regulation, restrictions or legality, we prefer primary
government or regulatory material and use cautious wording where the position depends on location, date or circumstance.
Editorial content on 1xbet.kim is informational and should not be treated as personalised legal advice.
7. When Sources Conflict
If reliable sources provide conflicting information, we do not silently choose the version that is more attractive
or commercially useful.
- We check publication dates and whether the sources refer to the same location or product.
- We give greater weight to direct or primary sources where appropriate.
- We may describe the uncertainty when the conflict cannot be resolved confidently.
- We avoid presenting disputed information as settled fact.
8. Errors and Corrections
Fact-checking reduces errors but does not eliminate them completely. If a material factual error is confirmed,
the affected content should be corrected as soon as reasonably practical.
Significant changes may also require an updated review date. Minor spelling or formatting corrections do not
necessarily represent a substantive factual update.
Our detailed correction workflow is explained in the
Corrections Policy.
9. Report a Possible Error
Readers can help us identify outdated or incorrect information. A useful correction report should include
the exact page URL, the claim in question and, where possible, a reliable source showing why it may be wrong.
Related Policies